You are hiring two or more people
At one hire a window and a per-hire fee land in a similar place. At two the window is already ahead, and the gap widens with every role after that.
fractional HR, employee relations & CHRO
Fractional means engaging a senior human capital specialist for a defined window, usually two to three months, and hiring as many people as you need inside it for one agreed cost. It is the most productive way to use this model and the one we recommend first. The same idea covers the rest of the people function: a CHRO one day a week, an employee relations specialist for one difficult quarter, an HR business partner to build what you have been meaning to build for two years.
Abu Dhabi, Dubai and the wider GCC. Remote, hybrid or onsite. Hire as many people as you need inside the window.
the fractional window
This is the part worth understanding before anything else on this page. You engage a specialist for a defined window, usually two to three months. Inside that window you hire as many people as you need. The cost is the window, not the headcount.
Two to three months of a senior specialist working your hiring. One agreed cost, set before anything starts, and it does not change if the roles change or multiply.
The two roles you were going to fill this quarter, the one you keep deferring, the replacement you know is coming, and the speculative hire you would never have paid a fee for. All of it, in the same window.
Nobody is paid more for finding you an expensive person. There is no reason to slow a search down, stretch it out, or push a candidate whose salary happens to be higher.
Arithmetic, not a forecast. The window cost is fixed, so every additional hire divides it further. What you actually achieve in two to three months depends on your roles, your market and how quickly your team gives feedback.
Compare that with a percentage of first-year salary. That fee is charged per hire, so your cost per hire never falls however well the search goes, and it rises with every senior person you appoint. A fixed window does the opposite. It is the only model on this site where the economics improve the more you use it, which is exactly why we would rather put you on it than sell you three separate searches.
when the window is the right shape
At one hire a window and a per-hire fee land in a similar place. At two the window is already ahead, and the gap widens with every role after that.
Roles that change shape mid-search are expensive under a fee per hire and free under a window. You can restructure a role halfway through without renegotiating anything.
A funding round, a new office, a contract win, a replacement wave. Intense for a quarter, then quiet. A permanent recruiter is a year-round cost for a two-month problem.
When it does not fit: a single specialist hire with no other roles behind it, and no plan to hire again this year. Say so and we will price it as one search rather than talk you into a window you will not fill.
who is on the bench
Recruitment is one slice of the people function. These are the rest, and most organisations have no route to them at all short of hiring someone permanent or engaging a consultancy.
Find, attract and engage the right people in your market and discipline. Available fractionally for steady hiring, or embedded for a surge.
Typical: one or two days a weekConfidential mandates at board and C level, run by specialists who have done it for years and own the networks that make it work. Retained in style, without a percentage of a package going to a brand.
Typical: per mandateThe proposition, the careers content, the candidate experience and the attraction campaigns. Why someone chooses you over the company down the road, which matters most when you are the less well known name.
Typical: a defined projectFrom interns and coordinators through to experienced business partners. Onboarding, structure, policy, performance frameworks and faster time to productivity. The work founders keep postponing, at whatever level the work actually needs.
Typical: one or two days a week, or a build projectStructure, roles, reporting lines, spans of control and the operating model. Usually the thing that should have happened before a hiring plan was written, and occasionally the reason a role does not need filling at all.
Typical: a defined projectChoosing an applicant tracking system, implementing it, and fixing the process and data around it. Most hiring problems blamed on technology are process problems wearing a system as a disguise.
Typical: a defined projectOne to one with an individual, usually a leader who has just stepped up or one carrying something difficult. Confidential, time-bound, and aimed at a specific shift rather than open-ended support.
Typical: a set number of sessionsBuilding capability across a team or a management layer, designed for your context rather than bought off a shelf. The alternative to hiring the same skill again in eighteen months.
Typical: a programmeConflict, grievance, formal investigations, disciplinary process, restructuring and compliance. The situations that carry real legal and reputational risk if handled by someone learning as they go.
Typical: per case or per quarterBoard-level people strategy, governance, succession, executive team design and workforce risk. A slice of a senior leader, without the executive salary.
Typical: one day a week or two days a monthYou do not have to know which one you need. Describe the problem and we will tell you which discipline it actually is, which is frequently not the one the client came asking for. A hiring problem is often an organisation design problem, and a retention problem is often a management capability problem.
when fractional is the right call
Fractional works when you need the seniority but not the volume. Here is where it fits, and where it does not.
We have 90 people and no one owns HR. It has landed on the COO, who has never done it and does not want it.
Fractional fits: a CHRO one day a week builds the structure, then hands to a permanent HR hire when volume justifies one.
We have grown past the people we know. There is no policy, no process, and a situation none of us is qualified to handle.
Fractional fits: an ER specialist handles the live situation properly while an HR partner builds the framework that prevents the next one.
We need one people leader across four portfolio companies, not four separate HR directors.
Fractional fits: a senior partner splitting defined days across the group, with consistent governance and reporting to the board.
We are running 200 people through onboarding a month and HR queries never stop.
Be honest: that is permanent headcount, not fractional. We will tell you when you have outgrown the model rather than sell you more days.
the cost picture
Worked on a typical UAE package for a senior people leader. Your exact rate is agreed with the specialist per brief, so treat this as the shape of the comparison rather than a price list.
| Senior people leadership | Permanent CHRO or HR Director | Management consultancy | Fractional via Hyring |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commitment | Full-time salary, benefits, end of service, notice period | Fixed-scope project fee, often six figures | Day rate for the days you use |
| Annual cost shape | AED 600,000 to AED 1,200,000 plus benefits, every year | Large upfront cost, then it ends and nobody owns the work | Roughly a fifth of a leader's time at roughly a fifth of the cost |
| Seniority you get | What your budget can attract at that salary | Senior partner sold it, junior team delivered it | The named senior person you chose, doing the work themselves |
| If it is not working | Notice period, end of service, replacement search | Contracted scope, hard to unwind | Tell us and we replace them. No redundancy exposure |
| When the need grows | Already fixed at full time | New scope, new fee | Add days, add a second specialist, or hand over to a permanent hire |
Permanent salary range reflects commonly quoted UAE packages for senior people leadership. source needed Replace with a cited salary guide, or with our own platform data once the sample is large enough. It excludes benefits, end-of-service accrual, recruitment cost to fill the role, and the cost of carrying that salary through quiet periods.
employee relations, specifically
Employee relations is where the cost of getting it wrong is highest and where fractional access matters most, because almost nobody needs a full-time ER specialist but almost everybody eventually needs one.
A formal complaint handled by someone who has run investigations before, documented properly, with an outcome that stands up to scrutiny.
Redundancy, role changes and senior exits managed with the process, documentation and communication they require in this jurisdiction.
The framework, policies and manager training that stop the same situation recurring once the immediate case is closed.
Most organisations call an employment lawyer at the point the situation has already gone wrong. An ER specialist engaged fractionally is the step before that, and it is considerably cheaper than the step after.
how it works
The problem in your own words. You do not need to know whether you want a CHRO or an ER specialist.
A senior person reads it and says which discipline and how many days. Sometimes the answer is fewer days than you expected.
Specialists with verified delivery in your sector and situation type, validated by a person before they reach you.
Agree days and rate. Scale up, hand over to a permanent hire, or stop when the work is done.
fractional HR questions
Fractional means engaging a senior specialist for a defined window, typically two to three months, and using them as much as you need inside it. The cost is the window rather than the headcount, so hiring two people or eight does not change the price. It gives an organisation genuine senior expertise, from someone who has done the job before, without a full-time salary, benefits, end-of-service accrual or notice period.
For human capital work the same principle applies to a pattern rather than a hire count: a CHRO for a set number of days across the window, or an employee relations specialist for one difficult quarter.
A fractional CHRO is an experienced chief human resources officer who works with your organisation on a part-time, ongoing basis, typically one day a week or two days a month. They handle board-level people strategy, governance, succession planning, executive team design and workforce risk. It is the right model for organisations that need CHRO-level judgement on real decisions but do not have enough volume of work, or enough budget, to justify a full-time executive at that salary.
You agree a day rate with the specialist for your brief, so there is no single list price. The useful comparison is against the alternative: a permanent senior people leader in the UAE typically costs AED 600,000 to AED 1,200,000 a year plus benefits and end-of-service, carried whether the workload justifies it or not. Engaging roughly a fifth of a leader's time costs in the region of a fifth of that, with no fixed commitment. For a defined ER case or policy build, a project fee is often the better structure and we will tell you which fits.
When the volume of day-to-day work, rather than the seniority of the decisions, is what is driving the need. High-volume onboarding, constant employee queries and continuous case load are signs you have outgrown fractional. A good pattern is to use a fractional CHRO to build the structure and hire the right permanent person into it, with the fractional specialist helping you hire and onboard their own successor. We would rather tell you that than sell you more days.
Both, and you choose. Fractional HR and CHRO work is often hybrid, with a fixed onsite day so the organisation knows when the people conversation happens, and the remainder remote. Employee relations casework frequently needs onsite presence for investigation meetings and hearings. In Abu Dhabi and Dubai we can match to specialists already resident with the right to work onsite. Say what you need in the brief.
Yes, and that is one of the most common ways ER specialists are engaged. They can run a formal grievance or disciplinary investigation end to end, produce the documentation, advise on outcome, and manage the process to a standard that stands up to later scrutiny. Many clients then keep the specialist on for a short period to build the policy framework and manager capability that prevents a recurrence.
No, and the difference matters. A consultancy typically sells a fixed-scope project, delivers a recommendation, and leaves. A fractional specialist is embedded in your organisation on an ongoing basis, owns the outcome rather than the report, and does the work themselves rather than selling it senior and delivering it junior. You get the named person you chose, in your business, accountable for what actually happens.
Yes, and this is common with family offices, holding companies and private equity portfolios. One senior people partner splitting defined days across the group gives you consistent governance, one point of accountability and a single view of workforce risk, at a fraction of the cost of separate HR leadership in each entity.
keep reading
When the need is hiring capacity rather than people expertise: a recruiter inside your team, on a day rate.
read moreThe founder is also a recruiter. The cost maths, the engagement models, and what to do first.
read moreVetting, independence, onsite working, security clearance, cost and confidentiality.
see all answersready when you are
You do not have to know whether you want a CHRO, an HR partner or an ER specialist. That is our job. Five minutes on the web.